Infantilized Intrigue

I hate it! I love it! I hate it! I CAN'T STOP LOOKING.

I was all set to write this post about the ways in which models are stylistically  infantilized. And how that’s so messed up!  Except that then I decided I actually kind of like it. I don’t think it’s necessarily attractive, but I think it’s endlessly intriguing. I should also draw a line in the sand. There is a clear artistic delineation between what the brilliant minds of stylists like Benjamin Sturgill and photographers like Damon Heath do with the cherubim faces of young models and what say, American Apparel, does with them.

That girl wearing the Commes Des Garcons coat that I would kill all the  firstborns for (please don’t send me any emails about how I want to murder babies– it’s a Biblical reference, so calm down) is Lindsey Wixon, from Wichita, Kansas. Lindsey was born in 1994,  just a few days after Kurt Cobain died! Isn’t that depressing?? Maybe you didn’t do the math, or maybe you don’t know that Kurt Cobain died on April 5, 1994– I didn’t know that either, but Wikipedia did and that’s what matters– but that makes Ms. Wixon 16 years old (soon to be 17).

This photo from the amazing book Wander Bird was the first photo I came across as I was looking for evidence for the ways in which models are infantilized and how that’s so messed up, man. I stared at this image for fifteen minutes off and on. I couldn’t figure out how old she was. Was this person in her mid-twenties, her early teens, or twelve? Was she even BORN yet??? The contrast between her weird Regan/Damien face and the sophisticated, worldly ensemble she’s sporting made me want to keep coming back to the image. I was unsettled. It wasn’t an easy read. And that’s smart.

More Lindsey from Wander Bird:

I would murder still more babies for that cape and those boots.

No babies are safe. All babies are in danger until I have a fashion pirate hat.

Some weeks ago the New York Times published an article entitled Pushing Fashion Boundaries in an Era Without Any. The article, among many things, addressed how designers have begun to use gender and sexuality taboos to get people to pay attention to a fashion industry that is increasingly being drowned out by the information, image, and persona deluge of the internet.

Which circles back to why it might be smart to use young models or models with extremely “young” features– it creates a dissonant experience for the viewer (when done well) and that dissonance can keep them coming back to an image over and over again.

A parade of dissonance:

Eight? Sixteen? Twenty Five? I don't fuckin know!

Karlie Kloss is ageless in this condom from the future.

Karlie Kloss has a face that is particularly confusing. Sometimes she looks like she should be in bed by 10pm and sometimes she looks 35. The design she’s wearing is always interesting enough, but I stay because I can’t figure out what the hell is going on with her face.

Karlie Kloss is 19 and she will kill you.

Speaking  of how Karlie Kloss looks like she will kill you, the best way to create visual dissonance is to place an innocent, beautiful little face in a sinister setting and/or in bizarre clothes. Horror movies have known about this since forever, but look at how well it plays out in fashion!

Commes des Garcons, meets The Ring, meets jammies.

A corset funnel hat has never been so chilling.

Bizarre “look alikes” are another great way to hold a gaze:

Olsen Twin, or Rob Zombie? No! Gemma Ward.

Gemma Ward, or Courtney Love? No! Sasha Pivovarova.

The thing about all of these odd face/setting/couture juxtapositions, the reason they’re not really messed up man, is that none of them are actually sexualized. In fact, most of them are vaguely off-putting. Intriguing. Off-putting. INTRIGUING. There’s no creepy skeezefest  fantasy playing out. No Catholic schoolgirl gone bad.


Question: Who even thinks a bad-ass Catholic school girl thing is hot?

Alexis Krauss will fuck a bitch up.

Answer: Everyone.

So magazine editors feel that fashion no longer has anything significant to say! But arguably neither does anyone else. The only winners in a brave new world defined by cacophony are those who can figure out how to create pause.  And Alexis Krauss.

About Michael von Braithwaite

Does it look like I'd wear it on a boat, at an eccentric person's estate or accompanied by a peacock on a chain? Yeah, I'll probably buy that.

One comment

  1. Pingback: Tweets that mention Infantilized Intrigue « Ironing Board Collective --

IBC LOVES your brain, and we encourage thoughtful, lively discussion. We will, however, moderate comments that are abusive or disrespectful. Stay classy!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: